Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-03-30 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 487.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4 XL is better than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), getting an 82.9 score against 74.4. Although Google Pixel 4 XL is just a bit thicker than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), it's a little lighter and also way newer. Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a bit larger screen, a greater pixels density and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels.
Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) features a bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4 XL, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB. Google Pixel 4 XL has a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Google Pixel 4 XL also has a higher amount of RAM.
Google Pixel 4 XL counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a lot lower 12.2 MP resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a bigger aperture to capture better photos in low light situations.
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) counts with better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 4 XL, because it has a 35 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.