Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2020-08-20 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 5.67 x 2.73 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Just black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 349.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3140mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 4a has a general score of 82.9, which is much better than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s 74.4 general score. Both of these phones have Android OS, but the Google Pixel 4a has an older 11 version while Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo. Although the Google Pixel 4a is just a little bit thicker than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), it's a lot lighter and also newer.
The Google Pixel 4a has a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a bit greater pixels density. The Google Pixel 4a has more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage.
Google Pixel 4a has just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Google Pixel 4a also has 2 GB more RAM memory. Google Pixel 4a has a lot better camera than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a back camera with way less mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger sensor providing a better image quality and a bigger aperture.
The Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) features a really longer battery duration than Google Pixel 4a, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.