Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2020-11-19 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.06 x 2.91 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Clearly white and Just black |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3885mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 4a 5G has a score of 87.5, which is better than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s 74.4 score. These phones include Android operating system, but Google Pixel 4a 5G has an older 11 version and Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo. Google Pixel 4a 5G's body is a lot newer and lighter than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s, but it's just a little bit thicker.
Google Pixel 4a 5G features a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a bit bigger display, a bit higher count of pixels per display inch and a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels. The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a little bit better processing power than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Google Pixel 4a 5G also has more RAM.
Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a back-facing camera with way less megapixels, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light photography and videos and a larger back camera sensor providing a higher image quality.
The Google Pixel 4a 5G counts with a better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has improved battery life than Google Pixel 4a 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3885mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.