Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-03-30 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Just black and Sorta sage |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 5 has an overall score of 89, which is much better than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s 74.4 overall score. Google Pixel 5's design has the same thickness than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), but it is way lighter. The Google Pixel 5 features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have a same size display, the Google Pixel 5 also has a slightly better 1080 x 2340 resolution and a just a little higher screen pixel density.
Google Pixel 5 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Google Pixel 5 also has 4 GB more RAM. Google Pixel 5 takes much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a back facing camera with way less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better images and videos in poorly lited environments and a bigger camera sensor which gives a better photo and video quality.
The Google Pixel 5 counts with more storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage. Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) counts with greater battery life than Google Pixel 5, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.