Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 13 |
| 2016-03-30 | -- |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 7.41 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gold and White | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 367 pixels per inch | 513 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Google Tensor G3 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 7.7 | 8.69 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5100mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 8 Pro is just a bit better than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), getting an 80.1 score against 74.4. The Google Pixel 8 Pro is a notably thinner and a lot lighter device than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016). Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Google Pixel 8 Pro has the older 13 version while Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Google Pixel 8 Pro features a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a greater pixel density, a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px and a little bit bigger display. Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) features a lot better hardware performance than Google Pixel 8 Pro, because although it has lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a higher number of cores.
The Google Pixel 8 Pro shoots better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a lot more MP back facing camera. Google Pixel 8 Pro counts with a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Google Pixel 8 Pro has a bit better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a 5100mAh battery size against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.