Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2021-06-25 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.44 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Amber Red, Emerald Green, Frost Crystal and Midnight Black |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2676 x 1236 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 440 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 17.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Honor 50 Pro is a bit better than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), having a global score of 77 against 74.4. Both devices we are comparing come with Android OS (operating system), but the Honor 50 Pro has the previous 11 version and Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Honor 50 Pro is a somewhat lighter phone than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), but both are equally thin.
The Honor 50 Pro counts with a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Honor 50 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM. The Honor 50 Pro counts with a little bit better looking display than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a higher resolution of 1236 x 2676px, a bit bigger screen and a just a bit better amount of pixels in each display inch.
The Honor 50 Pro captures way better photographs and videos than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have a F1.9 aperture, the Honor 50 Pro also has a camera in the back with a lot higher 108 megapixels resolution. The Honor 50 Pro features much more memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has greater battery life than Honor 50 Pro, because it has a 25 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.