Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 92.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2024-03-22 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 8.36 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Agate Grey and Frozen Berry |
| -- | Glass and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1389.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 367 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| -- | 5000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 10.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 24 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 1 TB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 23.2 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.7 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design is a lot better than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), with a global score of 92.1 against 74.4. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design's design is extremely newer, but heavier and thicker than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016). Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has the previous 14 version and Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has an incredibly better looking screen than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a quite larger display, a little higher quantity of pixels per display inch and a better 1280 x 2800 resolution. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a quite superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has more RAM.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a very superior memory for games and applications than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal memory. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design takes greater photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a lot larger sensor, a way larger diafragm aperture for better photos and video in low-light situations and a back camera with much more MP.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has 5600mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.