Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 92.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2024-03-22 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 8.36 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Agate Grey and Frozen Berry |
| -- | Glass and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 367 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| -- | 5000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 10.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 24 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 8.91 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 1 TB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 23.2 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.7 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition is much better than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), having a 92.1 score against 74.4. Both phones in this review come with Android OS (operating system), but Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition has an older 14 version and Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo. Although Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition is notably newer than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), it's thicker and somewhat heavier.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition has a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a little greater display density, a little bigger screen and a better resolution of 1280 x 2800. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition has a lot bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 1 TB internal storage capacity.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition counts with a greater hardware performance than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition also has more RAM. Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition captures greater videos and photos than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a back camera with a way higher resolution, a lot larger back-facing camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photos and a lot larger diafragm aperture.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Edition counts with just a bit better battery life than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a 12% more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.