Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2016-03-30 | 2018-06-01 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.03 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Aurora black, Moroccan blue, Platinum gray and Raspberry rose |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 170.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 563 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G7 ThinQ is slightly better than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), with an 81 score against 74.4. Both phones we are comparing here come with Android OS, but LG G7 ThinQ has a newer 9.0 Pie version while Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo. LG G7 ThinQ is a a lot lighter phone than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), but they are 0.31inches thick.
The LG G7 ThinQ counts with a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a little larger screen, a way better display density and a much higher 1440 x 3120 resolution. The LG G7 ThinQ has a very superior storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has more internal memory and an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The LG G7 ThinQ has a little bit better performance than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016). Both have 8 cores and 4 GB of RAM. The Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has a superior battery lifetime than LG G7 ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. LG G7 ThinQ captures a lot better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a tinier sensor capturing less light and dull colors, and they both have a same resolution camera, the LG G7 ThinQ also counts with a larger aperture to capture better captures in low light situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.