Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-03-30 | 2019-11-01 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.7 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG G8X ThinQ has a score of 82.7, which is much better than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s 74.4 global score. Both devices in our current comparison use Android OS (operating system), but the LG G8X ThinQ has an older 10 version while Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo. The LG G8X ThinQ design is a lot newer and just a little lighter than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s, although it is also a little bit thicker.
LG G8X ThinQ has just a bit better display than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a little greater pixel amount in each inch in the screen, a bit bigger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340px. The LG G8X ThinQ features a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and 96 GB more internal storage.
LG G8X ThinQ features a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a larger amount of RAM. The LG G8X ThinQ features a lot better camera than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a back camera with much less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture and a bigger back camera sensor.
The Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) counts with longer battery lifetime than LG G8X ThinQ, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.