Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-03-30 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.48 x 3.05 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Titanium and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.7 | 8.36 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
LG K61 is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), having a score of 77.6 against 74.4. Although LG K61 is a little thicker than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), it's a bit lighter and also much newer. These phones include Android OS, but the LG K61 has a more recent 9.0 Pie version while Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The LG K61 has a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a quite better 1080 x 2340 resolution, a just a little greater pixel density and a bit bigger screen. The LG K61 features just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016). Both of them have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core CPU.
LG K61 counts with a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB and 96 GB more internal storage. Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has longer battery performance than LG K61, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
The LG K61 shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a lot more megapixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.