Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 5.1 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| -- | Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.7 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 5.6 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V10 has a global score of 78.6, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s global score of 74.4. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V10 has older 5.1 version while Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo. Even though the LG V10 and Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) were released only 6 months apart, the LG V10 design is just a little bit thicker but just a little lighter.
Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) features a bit better processing unit than LG V10, and although they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) also has more cpu cores. The LG V10 features an incredibly better display than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater display pixels density and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px.
LG V10 has much more memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal storage capacity. The LG V10 captures much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have the same resolution back-facing camera, the LG V10 also has a larger back-facing camera sensor and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photos in poorly lited environments.
The Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has a very superior battery performance than LG V10, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.