Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 91.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.67 x 2.93 x 0.43 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 9.17 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Aurora gray and Illusion Sky |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 20.26 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.7 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG Wing is a lot better than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), with a 91.2 score against 74.4. LG Wing is a notably newer device than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), but it is heavier and a lot thicker. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but LG Wing has older 10 version while Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The LG Wing has just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG Wing also has a greater amount of RAM. The LG Wing has a slightly better screen than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a little higher 1080 x 2460 resolution, a little bit greater display density and a bit larger screen.
LG Wing counts with much more memory to install games and applications than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal memory. Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) features greater battery duration than LG Wing, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
LG Wing has a lot better camera than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a bigger aperture for better photos and videos in low light environments, a way bigger camera sensor and a much more MP back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.