Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 12 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a general score of 78.5, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s score of 74.4. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion is a much newer phone, and it is also a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016). Both of these devices use Android OS, but the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has the previous 12 version and Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has a very superior CPU than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. The Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a more vivid display than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a little bit larger display, a little bit more pixels per screen inch and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has a much better camera than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a way more MP back-facing camera, a much larger back camera sensor capturing lot higher quality photographs and videos and a bigger camera aperture to take better low light images and videos. Motorola Edge 30 Fusion counts with a greater storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has a bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has a 14% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.