Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| -- | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.7 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a score of 87.1, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s 74.4 score. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has older 14 version and Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Although Motorola Edge 50 Ultra is just a little thicker than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), it's just a bit lighter and incredibly newer.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a much better display than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a little bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, a little larger screen and a just a bit better screen density. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with a much better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) features a really superior performance than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots greater photographs and videos than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing lot better quality photos, a way better resolution camera and a bigger camera aperture to take better images in low light situations.
The Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, because it has an 11% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.