Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2020-12-07 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPS |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola Moto G 5G is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), having an 81.5 score against 74.4. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Moto G 5G has the previous 10 version and Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo. The Motorola Moto G 5G is a much newer cellphone than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), although it is a little bit heavier and a lot thicker.
Moto G 5G counts with just a bit better looking display than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 resolution, a quite greater pixel density and a quite bigger screen. Moto G 5G has a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016). Both of them have 4 GB of RAM and 8 CPU cores.
Moto G 5G takes a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a much more megapixels camera in the back and a larger camera aperture to take better low-light images and video. The Motorola Moto G 5G features much more storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Moto G 5G features a battery life that's just as good as the Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.