Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2016-03-30 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Moto Z Force has an overall score of 75.8, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s 74.4 general score. These phones come with Android OS, but the Moto Z Force has 7.0 Nougat version and Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Moto Z Force is a a little bit thinner and much lighter phone than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), even when both of them were released with only a few months difference.
Motorola Moto Z Force features a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), they both have 4 GB of RAM. The Motorola Moto Z Force has a sharper display than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
Moto Z Force counts with a much greater memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has 64 GB internal memory and an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Motorola Moto Z Force shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a bigger aperture to take better low light photos and videos and a camera with a much higher 21 MP resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has a superior battery performance than Moto Z Force, because it has a 43 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.