Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2016-03-30 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Moto Z3 is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), having a score of 77.6 against 74.4. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Moto Z3 has newer 9.0 Pie version while Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Moto Z3 is a extremely newer cellphone, and it's also somewhat thinner and notably lighter than the Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016).
Moto Z3 has just a bit better screen than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Moto Z3 also has a slightly higher 1080 x 2160 resolution and a just a little higher quantity of pixels in each inch in the display. The Moto Z3 has a much better storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB and more internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Moto Z3 has just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016). They have a 4 GB RAM and the same number of cores. The Motorola Moto Z3 takes greater photos and videos than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), although it has a tinier sensor offering a worse image quality, a camera with much less MP and a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low light captures and video.
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has a much better battery duration than Moto Z3, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.