Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-03-30 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Action is just a bit better than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), with a overall score of 78.5 against 74.4. The Motorola One Action is a a lot newer and lighter cellphone than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), although it's also somewhat thicker. Motorola One Action features a little bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a slightly better 1080 x 2520 pixels resolution, a just a bit higher count of pixels in each inch of screen and a bit bigger display.
The Motorola One Action counts with a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and 96 GB more internal storage capacity. Motorola One Action features a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016). They have 4 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Motorola One Action takes way better videos and photos than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a back-facing camera with a way lower resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture. The Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has a much longer battery performance than Motorola One Action, because it has a 43% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.