Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-03-30 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Zoom is a little bit better than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), getting an 80 score against 74.4. Although the Motorola One Zoom is thicker than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), it's just a little bit lighter and also notably newer. Motorola One Zoom features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a just a bit higher pixel number per inch of display, a little bigger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
Motorola One Zoom has a much better storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a slot for an external memory card that admits 128 GB smaller, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage. The Motorola One Zoom features a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016). They have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core CPU.
The Motorola One Zoom features a way better camera than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a larger aperture for better low-light captures and video, a lot bigger sensor taking way better quality videos and photographs and a camera in the back with much more mega pixels. Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) counts with greater battery lifetime than Motorola One Zoom, because it has a 25 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.