Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) is better than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), with an 87 score against 74.4. The Motorola razr (2020) design has the same thickness than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), but it's a little lighter. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola razr (2020) has older 11 version while Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Motorola razr (2020) has just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has 4 GB more RAM. The Motorola razr (2020) has a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a bit lower resolution of 876 x 2142 pixels, it also counts with a quite larger display and a bit more pixels per screen inch.
The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a much greater storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage capacity. Motorola razr (2020) shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking way higher quality photos, a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photography and video and a back camera with much more MP.
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has a really longer battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.