Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 12 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2022-08-18 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2022) has a score of 81.1, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s 74.4 general score. The Motorola razr (2022) construction is extremely newer, a bit lighter and just a bit thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016). Both devices in this comparison use Android OS (operating system), but Motorola razr (2022) has an older 12 version and Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Motorola razr (2022) counts with a bit better looking display than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a bit better display density, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little larger screen. The Motorola razr (2022) has a quite superior performance than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Motorola razr (2022) also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Motorola razr (2022) captures a lot better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have a F1.9 aperture, the Motorola razr (2022) also has a back camera with lot more mega pixels. Motorola razr (2022) features a better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Motorola razr (2022), because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.