Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2021-05-01 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.65 x 3.14 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Midnight Sun and Nordic Blue |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1080 x 2400 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 5G SM4350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 7.7 | 8.8 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4470mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia X20 is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), having a 77.2 score against 74.4. The Nokia X20 body is a lot newer, but thicker and just a little bit heavier than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016). Both phones we are comparing have Android OS (Operating System), but the Nokia X20 has the older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Nokia X20 features just a bit better screen than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a quite better resolution of 2400 x 1080 pixels, a little higher quantity of pixels in each display inch and a little larger display. Nokia X20 features a little bit better performance than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have 8 cores, the Nokia X20 also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Nokia X20 has a superior storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) counts with just a little bit longer battery duration than Nokia X20, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The Nokia X20 features a superior camera than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a back-facing camera with a way better 64 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.