Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.7 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Nokia XR20 has a score of 80.8, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s overall score of 74.4. Nokia XR20's design is a lot newer, but way heavier and thicker than the Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016). These devices come with Android OS, but Nokia XR20 has the older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Nokia XR20 has a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a little larger display, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little higher display density. The Nokia XR20 counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Nokia XR20 also has more RAM memory.
Nokia XR20 counts with a much better camera than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a larger aperture to capture better images and video in low-light environments, a camera with a lot better 48 megapixels resolution and a larger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors. Nokia XR20 features much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 96 GB more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Nokia XR20, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4630mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.