Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Ocean |
| -- | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.7 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The OPPO Find X2 Pro has an overall score of 83.1, which is much better than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s 74.4 score. Even though the OPPO Find X2 Pro is somewhat thicker than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), it's a little lighter and a lot newer. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but the OPPO Find X2 Pro has the older 10 version while Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has 8 GB more RAM. OPPO Find X2 Pro has a way better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a better pixels density, a little bigger screen and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3168px.
OPPO Find X2 Pro features a way bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The OPPO Find X2 Pro shoots greater photos and videos than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a larger aperture to take better low-light captures and video, a much better resolution back camera and a much bigger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
The Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) counts with superior battery performance than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has a 17% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.