Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.7 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A25 5G is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), with a general score of 79.9 against 74.4. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but the Galaxy A25 5G has 14 version and Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo. The Galaxy A25 5G design is noticeably newer and just a little lighter, but also just a bit thicker than the Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016).
The Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) features a very superior processor than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. Galaxy A25 5G has a sharper display than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, a quite larger display and a bit better pixels count in each display inch.
Galaxy A25 5G features a much bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB and 96 GB more internal storage. Galaxy A25 5G features a battery performance that is very similar to the Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) one.
Galaxy A25 5G features a greater camera than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a bigger aperture to capture better photography and videos in low-light environments, a bigger sensor taking better quality videos and photographs and a way more mega pixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.