Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-03-30 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 has a general score of 83.8, which is better than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s 74.4 overall score. Samsung Galaxy A50 is a incredibly newer device, and it's also lighter and a little thinner than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016). The Galaxy A50 features a little bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a bit bigger screen, a bit better display pixels density and a slightly higher 1080 x 2340 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016). Both of them have 4 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core CPU. Samsung Galaxy A50 takes a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have the same sensor size, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a way higher resolution back-facing camera and a larger aperture.
Samsung Galaxy A50 has a lot bigger memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) counts with longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 25% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.