Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-03-30 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50s is much better than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), with a global score of 86.6 against 74.4. These phones include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A50s has an older 10 version and Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo. The Samsung Galaxy A50s is a a lot newer cellphone, and it's also a lot lighter and just a little thinner than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016).
The Galaxy A50s has a bit sharper display than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, a just a little better screen pixel density and a little bit bigger screen. The Galaxy A50s has a little better processing power than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A50s also has 2 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy A50s has much more storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has an external memory slot that supports up to 512 GB and more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) features longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Galaxy A50s takes a lot better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for taking pictures in low light environments, it also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality and a back-facing camera with way more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.