Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Prism cube black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 5G has a general score of 90.8, which is much better than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s global score of 74.4. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A51 5G has an older 11 version and Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo. The Galaxy A51 5G is a way newer and lighter cellphone than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), but it is also a little bit thicker.
Galaxy A51 5G counts with a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a little bit larger screen, a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a quite greater display pixels density. The Galaxy A51 5G has a much bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy A51 5G has a little better performance than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy A51 5G also has 2 GB more RAM. The Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) features just a little better battery performance than Galaxy A51 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
The Galaxy A51 5G has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for capturing photos and/or video in low-light environments, it also counts with a camera in the back with a lot better resolution and a lot larger sensor taking lot better quality videos and pictures.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.