Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 12, 11 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a general score of 91.3, which is way better than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s 74.4 global score. Both phones in our current comparison use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has the previous 12 version and Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G body is extremely newer and just a little bit lighter, but a little thicker than the Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016).
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy A52 5G also has 2 GB more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a little more vivid display than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a bit larger display, a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit better pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a lot bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a back camera with lot more mega-pixels and a larger camera aperture. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G counts with a very superior storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB and more internal storage.
The Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) counts with just a little better battery duration than Galaxy A52 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.