Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-03-30 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A70 has an overall score of 76.9, which is a bit better than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s 74.4 global score. These devices include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A70 has older 10 version and Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Samsung Galaxy A70 design has the same thickness than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), but it's somewhat lighter.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy A70 also has a larger amount of RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A70 has a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a quite larger display, a just a bit greater screen density and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A70 has a superior storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has 96 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) takes greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A70, although it has a smaller aperture, they both have the same sensor size.
The Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) features a bit superior battery duration than Galaxy A70, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.