Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Prism bricks black |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G UW has a global score of 92.9, which is way better than the Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s 74.4 overall score. Galaxy A71 5G UW's body is notably newer and somewhat lighter, but also a little thicker than the Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016). These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy A71 5G UW has the older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW features just a bit better looking display than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a little higher display pixel density, a slightly better 1080 x 2400px resolution and a quite bigger display. Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy A71 5G UW also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a lot bigger back camera sensor providing a much higher image quality, a bigger aperture and a back camera with much more mega pixels. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) counts with a bit superior battery life than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.