Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 12 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2022-03-22 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | -- |
| Black, Gold and White | Aqua Blue and Forest Green |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 7.7 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F23 is better than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), having a global score of 84.6 against 74.4. Galaxy F23's construction is extremely newer and a lot lighter than the Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s, although it is just a little bit thicker. Both phones we are comparing use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy F23 has an older 12 version and Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Galaxy F23 counts with a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a little bit higher number of pixels per inch of display, a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2408px and a bit larger screen. Samsung Galaxy F23 counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016). Both have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processor.
The Galaxy F23 captures much better photos and videos than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a larger aperture for better low-light photos and video and a back camera with a way better 50 megapixels resolution. Galaxy F23 has a greater memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 96 GB more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy F23's battery lifetime is just as good as the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.