Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy F41 is much better than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), getting a general score of 85.2 against 74.4. Both devices in this review have Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy F41 has an older 11 version while Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Samsung Galaxy F41 construction is much newer and a little lighter, but also thicker than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016).
The Samsung Galaxy F41 has a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy F41 also has 2 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy F41 has just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a slightly better 1080 x 2340 resolution, a little bit bigger display and a little better pixels quantity per inch in the screen.
The Galaxy F41 captures way better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a much more mega-pixels back camera, a lot bigger camera sensor which offers a much better image and video quality and a larger aperture to capture better photos and videos in poorly lited situations.
The Galaxy F41 features a very superior storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has 32 GB more internal storage and a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy F41 has longer battery life than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.