Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.7 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F62 has a global score of 88.1, which is much better than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s 74.4 global score. Both devices in this review use Android OS, but Galaxy F62 has the older 11 version and Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo. The Galaxy F62 is a extremely newer cellphone than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), but it is a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker.
Galaxy F62 has a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a quite larger display, a little bit more pixels per inch of display and a quite better 1080 x 2400 resolution. Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with a higher amount of RAM.
Galaxy F62 has a much bigger memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 1 TB and 128 GB internal storage. Galaxy F62 takes greater photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a lot more MP back camera, a larger aperture for better captures and video in poorly lited situations and a way bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy F62 features a very superior battery duration than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.