Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-03-30 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a general score of 97.6, which is way better than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s 74.4 general score. These phones work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version and Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo version, providing a couple additional features. The Samsung Galaxy Fold construction is incredibly newer and thinner than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s, but it is also way heavier.
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a bit better looking display than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a little lower display pixels density, it also counts with a bigger screen and a better resolution of 1536 x 2152. Samsung Galaxy Fold has just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy Fold takes greater photos and videos than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a way less mega pixels back facing camera, it also counts with a larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot bigger camera aperture. The Galaxy Fold has a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has just a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.