Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2016-03-30 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.7 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M20 has a general score of 78.9, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s general score of 74.4. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android OS, but Galaxy M20 has older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Galaxy M20's design is noticeably newer and somewhat lighter, but also somewhat thicker than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016).
Galaxy M20 features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a bit more pixels per inch of screen, a little bigger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels. Galaxy M20 has a processor that's very similar to the Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) one, both of them have a 4 GB RAM memory and 8 processing cores.
Galaxy M20 features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), although it has a smaller back camera sensor shooting worse quality pictures and a less mega-pixels resolution back camera, they both have a same size camera aperture. The Samsung Galaxy M20 features a lot bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has more internal memory and an external SD slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
The Galaxy M20's battery performance is just as good as the battery life in Galaxy A9 Pro (2016).
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.