Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Black and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 367 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.7 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy M51 is much better than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), having an 87.7 score against 74.4. Even though the Samsung Galaxy M51 is way newer than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), it is somewhat thicker and just a bit heavier. These devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy M51 has 10 version and Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Galaxy M51 features a bit better processing power than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy M51 also has 2 GB more RAM. The Galaxy M51 counts with a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a little bit higher pixel density, a little bit larger screen and a bit higher 1080 x 2340 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a back-facing camera with a much higher 64 megapixels resolution, a larger camera aperture for better low light images and videos and a way larger sensor taking way higher quality photos. The Galaxy M51 features a much better storage for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy M51 features a really longer battery duration than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a 7000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.