Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-03-30 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 has a general score of 90.8, which is much better than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s global score of 74.4. The Galaxy Note 20 design is noticeably newer and a little bit lighter, but a bit thicker than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016). Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also has more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a little bigger display, a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little more pixels per inch in the screen. Galaxy Note 20 counts with a way better camera than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a camera with a much lower 12 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a much bigger sensor and a larger camera aperture to take better images and videos in low light situations.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a better storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) counts with improved battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.