Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is way better than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), with a 98.9 score against 74.4. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's design is extremely newer and just a bit lighter, but also a little bit thicker than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016). Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has 13 version and Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a brighter screen than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a much better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels, a better pixels density and a larger screen. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a way bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has 96 GB more internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a better processor than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra captures a lot better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a larger aperture, a way more MP camera and a lot bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) features a bit better battery performance than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.