Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-03-30 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.7 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has an overall score of 80.4, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s 74.4 global score. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition's construction has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), but it is a lot lighter. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a higher screen density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a much greater memory to install games and applications than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 256 GB, the Galaxy Note Fan Edition also has 64 GB internal memory. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a bit better processor than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016). Both of them have the same RAM amount and 8 cores.
Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) features a really longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has a 56% larger battery capacity. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition counts with a greater camera than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a back-facing camera with lot less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to take better low-light captures and videos and a larger sensor taking better quality photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.