Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-03-30 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a general score of 89, which is better than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s 74.4 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 body has the same thickness than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), but it's notably lighter. Galaxy Note10 has a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Note10 also has more RAM.
Galaxy Note10 counts with a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels, a quite larger display and a just a little more pixels per inch in the display. Galaxy Note10 takes much better photos and videos than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a back camera with much less MP resolution, it also counts with a bigger sensor shooting higher quality videos and photos and a way larger aperture.
Galaxy Note10 features a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) counts with a way better battery performance than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 43 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.