Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a score of 86.2, which is much better than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s 74.4 general score. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite construction is incredibly newer and a little bit lighter, but also a little thicker than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016). Both devices in this comparison include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has 11 version while Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a slightly better 1080 x 2400 resolution, a quite bigger screen and a quite higher pixels quantity per display inch. The Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Note10 Lite also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite has a lot bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has more internal memory and a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) features a bit superior battery performance than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a lot better camera than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a back facing camera with a lot lower resolution, it also counts with a bigger sensor which gives a better photo and video quality and a larger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.