Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-03-30 | 2014-09-29 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Black, Gold, Pink and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Mali-T760 MP6 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.8 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note4 has an overall score of 77.6, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s overall score of 74.4. Galaxy Note4's body is lighter than the Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), although it is just a little bit thicker and was released about 18 months before. The Galaxy Note4 counts with a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy Note4 has a more vivid screen than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) features a bit bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note4, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 256 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has a much better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3220mAh. The Galaxy Note4 takes greater photos and videos than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for taking photographs in poorly lited situations, and they both have a same resolution back facing camera, the Galaxy Note4 also counts with a bigger sensor capturing better quality videos and photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.