Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-03-30 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.7 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note7 has a score of 79.5, which is slightly better than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s 74.4 global score. Samsung Galaxy Note7's construction has the same thickness than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), but it's lighter. The Galaxy Note7 and Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) feature similar CPUs, and although the Galaxy Note7 has 4 lesser cpu cores , they both have a 4 GB RAM.
Galaxy Note7 has a little sharper display than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher amount of pixels per inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560. The Galaxy Note7 captures a lot better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a lot lower resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light captures and a larger sensor capturing higher quality videos and photos.
The Samsung Galaxy Note7 features much more storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB, the Samsung Galaxy Note7 also has 32 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has a superior battery duration than Galaxy Note7, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.