Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-03-30 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 has a general score of 88.3, which is better than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s 74.4 score. Samsung Galaxy S10 is a way lighter phone than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), but both are equally thin. Both of these devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S10 has 11 version and Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Galaxy S10 has a sharper screen than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a lot better 1440 x 3040 pixels resolution, a much better pixels number per inch of screen and a quite larger display. Samsung Galaxy S10 features a superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy S10 counts with just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S10 also has a higher amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy S10 has a greater camera than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a lot worse 12 megapixels resolution camera, it also counts with a larger sensor capturing better quality videos and photographs and a way bigger aperture for better images and video in low-light situations.
The Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) features a much longer battery life than Galaxy S10, because it has a 47 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.