Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 93.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-03-30 | 2019-05-16 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 3.04 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Crown silver, Majestic black and Royal gold |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 342.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 502 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 5G has an overall score of 93.6, which is a lot better than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s 74.4 general score. Galaxy S10 5G's body has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), but it's just a little lighter. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S10 5G has older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy S10 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a greater count of pixels per inch of screen, a bit larger display and a lot better 1440 x 3040 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S10 5G shoots way better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a lot less megapixels resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a much larger aperture to capture better low light images and video and a bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 5G features a much better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) features just a bit better battery performance than Galaxy S10 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.