Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-03-30 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10e has a general score of 86.3, which is much better than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s global score of 74.4. The Samsung Galaxy S10e body has the same thickness than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), but it's a lot lighter. Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a little faster processing unit than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy S10e counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels and a little bit higher pixel density. The Galaxy S10e features much more storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy S10e captures much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a camera with a lot lower 12 mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger sensor shooting higher quality videos and photos and a way bigger diafragm aperture for better low light photography.
The Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) features a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.