Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S20 has an overall score of 94.8, which is way better than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s overall score of 74.4. Both of these phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S20 has the older 13 version and Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo. The Samsung Galaxy S20 is a extremely lighter phone than the Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), but they have the same thickness.
Samsung Galaxy S20 features a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a quite bigger display, a way better 1440 x 3200 resolution and much more pixels per display inch. Galaxy S20 counts with a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S20 also has more RAM.
The Galaxy S20 takes a lot better videos and photos than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has a way lower 12 mega pixels resolution camera, it also counts with a much bigger sensor providing a way better image quality and a larger aperture for better photos in low-light environments. The Samsung Galaxy S20 has a much greater memory for apps and games than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S20, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.