Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.4 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 13, 12 |
| 2016-03-30 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.37 x 3.19 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 7.41 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Black, Gold and White | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 8976 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| -- | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a score of 95.4, which is a lot better than the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016)'s 74.4 global score. Even though the Galaxy S22 Ultra is way newer than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), it's somewhat thicker and a bit heavier. Both phones we compare here use Android OS, but Galaxy S22 Ultra has the previous 13 version and Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra features just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much more vibrant display than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels, a little larger screen and a higher display pixel density.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a greater memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Galaxy S22 Ultra's battery lifetime is very similar to the Galaxy A9 Pro (2016) one. Galaxy S22 Ultra captures way better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 Pro (2016), because it has a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera, a way larger back camera sensor and a larger aperture to capture better low light images and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.